http://17planets.com/blog/ The revealing research by solar system expert Donald Nelson en-us Nucleus CMS v3.32 � Weblog http://backend.userland.com/rss http://17planets.com/blog//nucleus/nucleus2.gif http://17planets.com/blog/ http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=29
Physicists claim that nothing can move without a power source to cause an object to move. The power source, or energy, is not eternal, or perpetual. While making those serious pronouncements, physicists ignore obvious contradictions to those ‘laws’ of theirs.

Do you know there are some objects that can move by themselves, without any force or energy to move them? Do you know that these objects can move, by themselves, in any direction, either with, either against, or else sideways to “Gravity”? Did you ever hear of a magnet?

If the magnetism, whatever that is, is supposed to be inside the magnetized object, how is it possible for the magnet to move, to a piece of steel, say, when “NOT acted upon by an outside force” such as hitting the magnet with a club?

Physicists, that is geologists, claim that magnetic substances such as lodestone, which is a form of magnetite, act like a magnet with a ‘north’ and a ‘south’ pole. The lodestone existed since the creation of Earth. Are billions of years not “perpetual” enough for physicists? As far as anyone can tell, the ‘energy’ inside the magnet will last the lifetime of a physicist. Or, as many generations of physicists as you care to cite. So, then the magnetism is “permanent” or lasts as close to forever, as we can observe and measure.

Likewise, wherever there are suitable objects that have iron in them, the magnet will move toward those objects ‘forever’. Magnets can perpetually move when not prevented by an intervening outside object, or ‘force’.

Furthermore, magnets can move without an outside force pushing the magnet to the object it likes. It is ‘attracted’ to the other object. Magnetic attraction sounds pretty much like a form of Love. Do people have it too?


The author did not discuss String 29, the Perpetual Ability of Magnetism to Cause Motion, in the Maldec Report. This is an afterthought. The 280 or so other, far more urgent, topics in the Report should keep your brain cells busy enough figuring out how to survive the next few years. It likely is more useful to read the Maldec Report before contributing to most of the foregoing Strings. However, the author welcomes input from interested readers. Thank you, before hand, for your reactions to this Blog
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=29 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:07:32 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=28
Astronomers, as scientists, copy the false theories of physicists. Astronomers thus claim that a large object in space can make small objects move toward the large object. Sir Isaac Newton strongly denounced such spurious claim. Yet, because he’s dead, and can’t defend himself now, scientists say that Newton was a great scientist, and that Newton propounded the preposterous theory of Mass and the imaginary “gravitational force.”

Einstein, apparently without sufficient consideration, believed in the strange property of mass (M), and put it into his famous theory E = M times C squared.

Find out the fallacy of the idea of “mass.” This fallacy destroys Einstein’s Theory of Relativity. Oh, well. It was just a theory. The explanation is in one of the 280 or more topics in the Maldec Report.]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=28 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:06:32 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=27

ET Tro said that Sirius was where his home is. He should know how far away it is. ET Tro said that he was “…from a planet nearly 70 lightys distant.”

It appears that astronomers will have to rethink their theories. The correct answers to these questions will allow astronomers more accurately to estimate the distances among the stars of the visible Universe. The accurate answers to these questions, and 280 other topics the author reveals in the Maldec Report, will revolutionize traditional measuring systems, carbon dating methods, calendar dates of historic events, etc.]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=27 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:05:56 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=26 General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=26 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:05:34 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=25 General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=25 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:05:23 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=24
The Sun, or Sol, lacks dark and light sides. Therefore, no one can measure time on Sol, with the rotation of Sol. Time lacks existence on Sol.
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=24 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:05:06 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=23
Is the famous theory of Einstein’s, E = M times C squared false? Find out how C, which is the so-called “speed of light,” and assumed to be ‘constant’, actually varies. This destroys Einstein’s formula and theory.
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=23 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:04:47 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=22
Pyramids locate in Fibonacci ratios on perfect great circles around Earth. This was tens of thousands of years before Fibonacci ‘discovered’ the mathematical ratio and proportions. Notice how the structures in Peru, are on the great circle that goes through the Great Pyramid in Egypt, and are exactly 180 degrees from the structures at Siem Reáp in Cambodia.

Did any of the early ‘scientists’ two-hundred years ago, or the very much smarter scientists one-hundred years ago, design those pyramids? Scientists, engineers, construction technicians, and building contractors living today cannot do that. Are some scientists not as smart as they like to boast?
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=22 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:04:22 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=21 for neat info about Mars.

What (larger?) orbit was Mars in before its present orbit?
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=21 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:04:00 -0600 http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=20
Who built the cities and the nine-miles-tall glass-like structures on Earth’s moon Luna?

Was Luna an inhabited planet of Subsun Maldec? Boriska Kipriyanovich, the “Indigo Child” in Russia, says Mars. See website , as also websites , and , for articles about Boriska Kipriyanovich.

Also, check out website for amazing data about Luna and Mars.
]]> General http://17planets.com/blog/index.php?itemid=20 Sat, 20 Sep 2008 17:03:42 -0600